Make Hartati Solutions Act One

JAKARTA - Constitutional Law Expert Yusril Ihza Mahendra boss defends Hardaya PT Inti Plantation, Siti Hartati Murdaya, related to alleged bribery case to the District Buol, Amran Batalipu, the issuance of leasehold oil palm plantations. Yusril asked the Corruption Court could take a wise decision in view Hartati bribery case.

"In this case, the incumbent asking for donations, the position of the entrepreneur is hard. Incorrectly given, not given one. Whereas in this context, the law must apply the fair," said Yusril in testimony Hartati bribery trial at the Corruption Court in Jakarta, Monday ( 01.07.2013).
Yusril call rule legislation has placed Hartati awry. He asserted, the state could not have existed without the presence of the role of entrepreneurs. "Stay where we provide limited tolerance. Which should be given at this time is truly wisdom," he said.
Related questions employers contribution in the selection, Yusril replied Act declared invalid election donation from a person or business entity, but a certain amount. Donations must also be reported to law enforcement. "Election donation limits that regulated entities Law, Rp 350 million. If there are 400 million donation for example, have adapted well reduced the amount to Rp 350 million. Do not necessarily because it exceeds the maximum contributing criminalized," he explained.
Hartati bribery case occurs when the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) arrested Hardaya Manager PT Inti Plantation, Yani Anshori, for allegedly handed money to Amran Batalipu, on June 26, 2012. In the action catching hand, Amran got away because it is protected by hundreds of supporters.
Amran could only KPK arrested early Friday, July 6, 2012. The day after surgery the hand catching bribes Regent Buol, KPK and catch Gondo Sujono, Sukirno, and Dedi Kurniawan in at Soekarno-Hatta. Two last names later removed because they have no involvement in the bribe.
Sources: http://news.okezone.com/read/2013/01/07/339/742449/