Pain While Urinating? Watchful Prostate Disorders

JAKARTA, KOMPAS.com - Chairman of the Constitutional Court (MK) Mahfud MD praised President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to justice in the Court. Mahfud called MK could be as it is now because there is no intervention by the President. He also said they were proud to work as a constitutional judge for five years because the Court recognized as a credible and independent. In fact, the Indonesian Constitutional Court referred to one of the 10 best in the world MK.
"That's because I truly see and feel for our work, Mr. President, no intervention whatsoever on the Court," Mahfud said after meeting with the President at the State Palace, Jakarta, Wednesday (12/05/2012).

Mahfud will be present to report on the closure of the constitutional judges himself and four others in 2013. The four judges, namely Maria Farida Indrati, Muhammad Ali, Akil Mochtar, and Ahmad Sodikin.
In a closed meeting, the President was accompanied by Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Affairs Djoko Suyanto, State Secretary Sudi Silalahi, Cabinet Secretary Dipo Alam, and Deputy Justice Minister Denny Indrayana.
Mahfud said Indonesia's recent past and the present in the other countries, the judiciary is not independent because of the intervention of the head of government. According to Mahfud, frequent confession he received when he met with the constitutional judges of other countries.
"(The judge constitution else asked) why you are so great, so progressive, making a shocking verdicts? Are there no interference from the government? I told the President we never interfere in the affairs of the Court," said Mahfud.
In addition to the absence of the intervention of the President, according to Mahfud, MK current condition due to progressive constitution and independence of all judges when it works. Mahfud believe there is no constitutional judges involved irregularities.
"Although there is often no slander here, but we are saying is always open to be proven that there are things that are not good. We work openly and know the heart of each. Difference of opinion did not arouse suspicion because we know (another judge) has perspective on the case, "said Mahfud.


source: http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2012/12/05/12051911/